Nike vs. Hoka: Editor Tested and Reviewed

You can't go wrong with a pair of Pegasus. Having been first introduced in 1983, the style rests at the intersection of performance and affordability. But if 40 years of history isn't convincing enough, I've got the lowdown on why these have been paving roads for so many years.

You can't go wrong with a pair of Pegasus. Having been first introduced in 1983, the style rests at the intersection of performance and affordability. But if 40 years of history isn't convincing enough, I've got the lowdown on why these have been paving roads for so many years.

Simply put, the sneaker is reliable. Its high responsiveness gives you more spring in your step, the medium cushioning keeps your steps soft, and its neutral support stabilizes your stride. All combined with being breathable and designed with the intention to make the inner confines of the shoe tailored to your foot. One of the best parts about the sneaker is that the toe box is just the right size—not too wide that your foot is sliding around, but not too narrow that it's squishing your baby toe.

Yes, it is supportive, but it's not the most supportive shoe on the market. That's where Hoka steps in. But when it comes down to why Nike wins the battle (for me), it's about style. I like my sneakers to be sleek and subtle, transitioning from my workout to the rest of my day. When I travel, I can wear my Pegasus on the plane, to the gym, and then out and about for all the explorations I embark on. The model itself also comes with not just a range of colors, but purposes as well. There's a GORE-TEX Pegasus for the trail runner, a FlyEase for both on and off roading, even a Turbo for racing. And it's this versatility that gives Pegasus the edge.

ncG1vNJzZmivp6x7pr%2FQrqCrnV6YvK57y6Kdnqukrrmme8eemKWsmGS0dX%2BWcGhuaGZku6q3xGatrGWYpLiiew%3D%3D

 Share!